<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where did the FlexBuilder Advanced Constraints UI go?</title>
	<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17</link>
	<description>ruminations on technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: sandrar</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>sandrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post... nice! I love your blog.  :) Cheers! Sandra. R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post&#8230; nice! I love your blog.  <img src='http://iamdeepa.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Cheers! Sandra. R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily del.icio.us for July 27th through August 5th &#8212; Vinny Carpenter's blog</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-873</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily del.icio.us for July 27th through August 5th &#8212; Vinny Carpenter's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-873</guid>
		<description>[...] iamdeepa on flex &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Where did the FlexBuilder Advanced Constraints UI go? - For Flex 3, the Advanced Constraints feature introduces the concept of ConstraintColumn and ConstraintRow objects that can be used to partition up absolute positioning containers. We broadened the constraint syntax to allow for controls to be constrained  Tags: adobe, amqp, architecture, asynchronous, collaboration, communication, development, distributed, flash, flex, flex3, flexbuilder, messaging, opensource, programming, software [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] iamdeepa on flex &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Where did the FlexBuilder Advanced Constraints UI go? - For Flex 3, the Advanced Constraints feature introduces the concept of ConstraintColumn and ConstraintRow objects that can be used to partition up absolute positioning containers. We broadened the constraint syntax to allow for controls to be constrained  Tags: adobe, amqp, architecture, asynchronous, collaboration, communication, development, distributed, flash, flex, flex3, flexbuilder, messaging, opensource, programming, software [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepa Subramaniam</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepa Subramaniam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-624</guid>
		<description>@Brett: Yup, that was me. Hey, we've met! Yes, its a handy little trick for improving efficiency and I can see how the bug would be quite annoying. Get it voted on and that will definitely make it high on the list of bugs for the next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brett: Yup, that was me. Hey, we&#8217;ve met! Yes, its a handy little trick for improving efficiency and I can see how the bug would be quite annoying. Get it voted on and that will definitely make it high on the list of bugs for the next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-623</guid>
		<description>@Deepa:  I showed someone at max in chicago this bug.  I posted the bug back when the first beta came out.  I was hoping more would see it and vote on it as well.  Again it's a great feature!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Deepa:  I showed someone at max in chicago this bug.  I posted the bug back when the first beta came out.  I was hoping more would see it and vote on it as well.  Again it&#8217;s a great feature!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 00:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-622</guid>
		<description>Yay Deepa's feature!!!!! You rock :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Deepa&#8217;s feature!!!!! You rock <img src='http://iamdeepa.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepa Subramaniam</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-621</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepa Subramaniam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-621</guid>
		<description>@Lordy: I am working on some performance tests as we speak but on a whole I'd venture to say that constraints are faster then heavily nested containers. Stay tuned for specific performance results, I'll publish them here on my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lordy: I am working on some performance tests as we speak but on a whole I&#8217;d venture to say that constraints are faster then heavily nested containers. Stay tuned for specific performance results, I&#8217;ll publish them here on my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deepa Subramaniam</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Deepa Subramaniam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-620</guid>
		<description>@Brett: I remember someone showing me that bug at 360Flex in Seattle (was it you?). If you'd really like to see it fixed, go ahead and vote on it and get someone else to vote on it too. That will raise its priority when we decided on bugs to fix in later releases. I'll also comment on it internally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brett: I remember someone showing me that bug at 360Flex in Seattle (was it you?). If you&#8217;d really like to see it fixed, go ahead and vote on it and get someone else to vote on it too. That will raise its priority when we decided on bugs to fix in later releases. I&#8217;ll also comment on it internally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flex Builder 3 Beta 3 - The First 24 Hours &#124; Nathan Levesque</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>Flex Builder 3 Beta 3 - The First 24 Hours &#124; Nathan Levesque</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 04:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-618</guid>
		<description>[...] noted here on Deepa Subramaniam&#8217;s blog, this feature has been dropped from Flex Builder 3. Sad to hear this, because honestly, this made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] noted here on Deepa Subramaniam&#8217;s blog, this feature has been dropped from Flex Builder 3. Sad to hear this, because honestly, this made [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Walker</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 02:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-617</guid>
		<description>That's too bad, but better to see a feature done right late than saddled with bad decisions for years to come.

On a different tangent, I was playing with the beta 3 syntax coloring (thanks so much for finally adding it to FB) and noticed that the preview for Actionscript and MXML coloring doesn't reflect the current background color (which is confusingly set in a different part of Preferences).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s too bad, but better to see a feature done right late than saddled with bad decisions for years to come.</p>
<p>On a different tangent, I was playing with the beta 3 syntax coloring (thanks so much for finally adding it to FB) and noticed that the preview for Actionscript and MXML coloring doesn&#8217;t reflect the current background color (which is confusingly set in a different part of Preferences).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lordy</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Lordy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-616</guid>
		<description>I'm just glad that we have advanced constraints! BTW performance wise is it cheaper to use these constaints then nested containers and spacers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just glad that we have advanced constraints! BTW performance wise is it cheaper to use these constaints then nested containers and spacers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-615</guid>
		<description>I for one am glad to see it removed .. It seemed like it wasnt ready for primetime , made the whole flexbuilder sluggish and a pain to use .  
That said, I did see that it had lots of potential and look forward to a re-incarnation in the future , hopefully a bug free one ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am glad to see it removed .. It seemed like it wasnt ready for primetime , made the whole flexbuilder sluggish and a pain to use .<br />
That said, I did see that it had lots of potential and look forward to a re-incarnation in the future , hopefully a bug free one <img src='http://iamdeepa.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-614</guid>
		<description>thanks for the update...sad to see it go.  I hope it will be brought back in a patch once the final is released.  I really prefer it over the old UI.

Also I'm really anxious to see the bug fixed for the dual view/undo problem I have...it a great feature that I don't think enough people know able but it's a great was to get around in your projects.

https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-7649

Looks like it will also be a future build after the final release.  Guess I have a lot to look forward to after the final release:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the update&#8230;sad to see it go.  I hope it will be brought back in a patch once the final is released.  I really prefer it over the old UI.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m really anxious to see the bug fixed for the dual view/undo problem I have&#8230;it a great feature that I don&#8217;t think enough people know able but it&#8217;s a great was to get around in your projects.</p>
<p><a href="https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-7649" rel="nofollow">https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FB-7649</a></p>
<p>Looks like it will also be a future build after the final release.  Guess I have a lot to look forward to after the final release:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Leavitt</title>
		<link>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-613</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Leavitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://iamdeepa.com/blog/?p=17#comment-613</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads-up on that, I had wondered what had happened.  It's an extremely powerful feature, but like many powerful features it was also somewhat complicated.  Looking forward to seeing it come back at some point.  Even an option to turn it on or off would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads-up on that, I had wondered what had happened.  It&#8217;s an extremely powerful feature, but like many powerful features it was also somewhat complicated.  Looking forward to seeing it come back at some point.  Even an option to turn it on or off would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
